<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electrostatic Mist Collectors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/</link>
	<description>Mist Eliminators for Indoor Metalworking Machine Oil, Coolant, Smoke and Mist Pollution Control Equipment</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Jason,

I am in agreement with what you were prescribed in terms of water content, for the most part.  Coolants with high water content can evaporate more quickly than synthetic coolant, causing the pollutants to dry on the cells.  This ultimately leads to increased maintenance, and in some cases, malfunction.  There are some electrostatic mist collectors available with patented technology that allows you to switch the voltage going to the cells, rendering optimal performance for each main type of coolant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I am in agreement with what you were prescribed in terms of water content, for the most part.  Coolants with high water content can evaporate more quickly than synthetic coolant, causing the pollutants to dry on the cells.  This ultimately leads to increased maintenance, and in some cases, malfunction.  There are some electrostatic mist collectors available with patented technology that allows you to switch the voltage going to the cells, rendering optimal performance for each main type of coolant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Paper Shredders,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If your application allows, a small electrostatic unit direct-mounted would definitely be the best suited solution, in my opinion.&#160; If you can use individual units, there's less margin for error, compared to centrally ducted systems.&#160; Most performance issues with ducted systems stem from improper air balancing and erroneous duct design.&#160; For example, if you have multiple machines on a line, all connected to a central air cleaner, opening the cabinet on the one closest to the mist collector will negatively affect the capture velocity from the other machines in the line.&#160; That said, it is of utmost importance to make sure that no detail is overlooked if you plan to duct multiple machines to a centralized mist collector.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper Shredders,</p>
<p>If your application allows, a small electrostatic unit direct-mounted would definitely be the best suited solution, in my opinion.&nbsp; If you can use individual units, there&#8217;s less margin for error, compared to centrally ducted systems.&nbsp; Most performance issues with ducted systems stem from improper air balancing and erroneous duct design.&nbsp; For example, if you have multiple machines on a line, all connected to a central air cleaner, opening the cabinet on the one closest to the mist collector will negatively affect the capture velocity from the other machines in the line.&nbsp; That said, it is of utmost importance to make sure that no detail is overlooked if you plan to duct multiple machines to a centralized mist collector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Wege</title>
		<link>http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>I have spoke with distributors that sell both ESP and Media based filtration units and recommend media based systems for water soluble coolants because of the high water content can you comment on that for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spoke with distributors that sell both ESP and Media based filtration units and recommend media based systems for water soluble coolants because of the high water content can you comment on that for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paper shredders</title>
		<link>http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>paper shredders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misteliminators.org/blog/electrostatic-mist-collectors/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>If my application will allow, myfirst choice should be a small electrostatic mist collector mounted directly to your machine enclosure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my application will allow, myfirst choice should be a small electrostatic mist collector mounted directly to your machine enclosure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
